This article offers a system view of intranet governance. It is based on a simple strategy that can be applied across different areas. The areas that I've covered are: information organization, publishing, collaboration and applications.
It is surprising how many conversations on intranet governance take place in isolation, getting treated like an independent piece that just needs to be plugged in.
“We have an intranet and we like to talk about governance.” “Sure, let’s start with your objectives, your strategy.” “Huh? What’s that all about now?”
To deal with this problem we need to use a systems approach. We need to make it simple for people to see and visualize that there are other pieces of the puzzle involved and they all need to be in sync for the whole to be useful.
I’ve been thinking about these lines for sometime now. The KM Singapore conference gave me an opportunity to put these thoughts together. The entire presentation can be found lower in this page.
This article is a continuation of the ideas from the first article on “Intranet Governance Guide”.Intranet governance -- a definition
Intranet governance is a framework for managing, supporting and improving the intranet. It aligns people and technology to realize business value.
The big question here is: what constitutes business value? The mission and vision statements are lofty goals. They give a start but they need to be presented in people terms and they need to be viewed from a systems perspective.
Thinking about business value is about asking the right questions and making the right decisions. For example: “So you want to go the records management way? Why? Who benefits? Who looses? What does six months down the road look like?”
The point here is to appreciate that the intranet is one of the key elements that contributes to business value and then to position, design and govern it like other value adding elements.
The governance cycle
The governance cycle looks at governance from a systems perspective. It has 3 parts:

- Strategy -- having the right people, processes and technology in place, but before all this, it is about having the right idea in place.
- Engagement -- reaching out to stakeholders and staff using marketing, training and professional services.
- Feedback -- monitoring and measuring the intranet performance.
There are 4 areas that I think this cycle and be applied to:
- Information organization
- Publishing
- Collaboration
- Applications
Applying the cycle to publishing can result in the following:
Primary purpose:To ensure that common content on the intranet is of high quality and to make it easy for all staff to find, interpret and use the content in a productive and cost-effective way.
What needs to be in place:
- Easy publishing technology
- Publishing processes
- Content style guide
- Page templates
- Examples, non-examples
- Publishing checklists
- Training guides
- …
Engage:
- Build awareness
- Give training
- Expose best practices
- …
Get feedback:
- Anecdotal evidence
- Direct feedback from staff
- Usability testing
- Analytics
- …
The same approach can be applied to the other 3 areas but the methods will be different. More examples are given in the presentation below.
The presentation
Here is the full presentation. There were many activities planned in the actual presentation. I’ve removed these slides to make it more compact for browsing on the web.
Simon Goh
website
permalink
Nice thoughts, this comes in useful even for a budgeting exercise at the start of the year as a framework for us to think through the justifications required.
Stakeholders engagement is key to success. Involving them in decision making is abolutely necessary. This means that we got to intentionally hold back our ideas/solutions and give them some room to decide on what’s good for them. Our job is to make theirs better.
I also think that Feedback is an opportunity for the intranet to stay relevant to the business. For example, to be involved in workplan discussions across the organisation and see how the intranet can help various departments succeed or resolve some of the issues.
Maish Nichani
permalink
Yes, the idea was to create an intranet toolkit which as of now comprises of information organisation, publishing, collaboration and apps. With this approach the team will have oversight of the most important elements that make up the intranet. It will also help them focus on delivering value.
Frank Lynch
website
permalink
yes as is the case with most websites or intranets it is simply impossible to achieve any long-lasting success without a clearly defined ownership and management structure. Intranet governance provides clarity and rules: namely the titles, roles and responsibilities of its owners, managers, stakeholders and contributors. However, at the heart of a successful model, is a powerful executive with purse strings, supported by a solid intranet team.
James Murdoch
website
permalink
this case becomes more weighty when it comes to a corporate sector and especially technical sectors where intranet holds an important power to manage almost everything including servers.
Jeffery
website
permalink
I with you agree. In it something is. Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles.